Legal Opinion
In Re McNeal
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 22, 1939No. Crim. 1673PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
The petitioner was convicted of a misdemeanor committed by selling loaves of bread to which labels or trademarks designating the manufacturer thereof were not attached, contrary to the provisions of section 8 of the Sanitary Bakery Law of California. (Stats. 1921, p. 1191, and amendment of 1931, p. 250; 1 Deering’s Gen. Laws of 1937, p. 192, Act 610.) The petitioner was imprisoned as a penalty for that offense, and now seeks to regain his liberty by means of habeas corpus.
It is contended the act is unconstitutional for the reason that it imposes onerous burdens on the business of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Reid v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Reid v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Schmidinger v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Ex Parte DrexelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- In Re LeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re PorterfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Serve Yourself Gasoline Stations Ass'n v. BrockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- In Re MakiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- State v. Double Seven CorporationArizona Supreme Court · 1950
- In Re PorterfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.