Legal Opinion
Robin C. McDermott v. Thomas Dean Royal
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided September 10, 2004No. 03-3690UnpublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Per curiam
This matter arises under Plaintiffs petition for rehearing. We hold the petition for rehearing should be granted. The court’s earlier opinion issued on July 27, 2004, is ordered vacated and is replaced by the following opinion.
Robin McDermott appeals pro se from a final order entered in the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri 1 granting Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. In her complaint, McDermott alleged that she was denied the rights secured to her by the First, Fourth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution by virtue of Defendants’…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- City of Houston v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Kay v. EhrlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Elbert Whaley Jones v. Gary Jerrison, Parole Officer Cranston Mitchell, Board of Probation and Parole and the Attorney General of MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- Shameika L. Gilmore v. At & TCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- Davis v. ParrattCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Marcello v. MaineDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2006
- Robin C. McDermott v. Thomas RoyalCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
- Hoyland v. McMenomyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2016
- Glover v. Wells Fargo BankDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2023
- Mark Christians v. Darin Young, Troy Ponto, Jessica Cook, Brent Fluke, Rebecca Schieffer, Alex Reyes, Seth Hughes, Nancy Christensen, Deb Eilers, Laurie Stratman, Julie Stevens, Angela Pechous, Greasman, a/k/a Adam Sims, Bryan MarjamaDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2026
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.