Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Emerson Phonograph Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 7, 1924No. 149PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMayer, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). The duty of receivers such as those in this case has been recently restated by this court as follows:

“It is the receiver’s duty to accept as part of the estate to be administered for the creditors those assets which will prove of value to the estate. _ Those which are not of value are to be left outside the field of his receivership. As to those assets which are of problematical value, it is necessary that the receiver should he allowed a reasonable time within which to determine to which class of assets they belong, whether they are of the class which he…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. American Brake Shoe & Foundry Co. v. New York Rys. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Palmer v. PalmerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
  2. In Re Chase Commissary CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1935
  3. In Re Sturgis Iron & Metal Co., Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 2009
  4. In re Mallow Hotel Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1937
  5. In re: Sturgis Iron & Metal Co., Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API