Legal Opinion

Rolnick v. Rolnick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 15, 1928PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order reversed upon the law and the facts, without costs, and motion for alimony, counsel fee, etc., denied without prejudice, without costs. The record herein does not show reasonable probability that the plaintiff will prevail upen the trial and, therefore, the granting of temporary alimony, counsel fee, etc., was improper. (De Vide v. De Vide, 186 App. Div. 814.) Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Young, Seeger and Carswell, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. De Vide v. De VideAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Shuart v. ShuartNew York Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Bradley v. BradleyNew York Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Villasenor v. VillasenorNew York Supreme Court · 1951