Legal Opinion

Palin v. State

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 1894No. 5995PublishedCited by 30 opinions

Error to the district court for Lancaster county. Tried below before Tibbets, J.

1Opinion of the CourtNormal, C. J.

At the September term, 1892, of the district court of Lancaster county, an information was filed by the county attorney, charging the plaintiff in error, on the 11th day of July, 1892, with assaulting one Maud Shaffer, a female child of the age of six years, with the felonious intent to carnally know and abuse her with her consent. Upon the trial the jury returned a verdict of guilty against the plaintiff in error, whereupon his counsel filed a motion for a new trial, which was overruled by the court, and an exception taken. Thereupon plaintiff in error was sentenced to confinement in the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. JennesMichigan Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Lawson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1852
  3. Olive v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Commonwealth v. NicholsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  5. Cowan v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1887

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. CarnagySupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  2. Bateson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1904
  3. State v. BeuermanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1898
  4. Durden v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  5. State v. PiskorskiNebraska Supreme Court · 1984

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API