Legal Opinion
Doe v. Georgetown Center (II), Inc.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided March 5, 1998No. 94-CV-607, 94-CV-687 and 94-CV-743PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FARRELL, Associate Judge:
Before us are an appeal and cross-appeals stemming from a jury verdict in favor of plaintiff-appellant, denominated Jane Doe, for injuries suffered in an assault by a third party for which she sought to hold liable in negligence the three defendants, who are owners or managers of the building and surrounding area where the assault took place. Doe contends that the jury’s award of damages was inadequate as a matter of law and that the trial court erroneously instructed the jury, as to two defendants found not liable, that the test of liability was gross negligence…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hansford P. Miller v. Jackson AviromCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- Sarah B. Kline v. 1500 Massachusetts Avenue Apartment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
- Alonzo Wayne Taylor v. The Washington Terminal CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- District of Columbia v. DoeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Holder v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sabir v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- In re Seth Adam RobbinsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
- Posner v. HolmesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
- Ruffin v. Temple Church of God in Christ, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000