Legal Opinion

Hogg v. Darden

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 13, 1964No. 5-3132PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ed. F. MoFaddin, Associate Justice.

We are here concerned with the voir dire examination of the jury panel. Appellants, Mrs. Elizabeth Hogg, and her husband, filed this action against George A. Darden and his son, alleging- that in a traffic mishap Mr. and Mrs. Hogg sustained injuries and damages all because of the fault and negligence of the defendants. Upon issues joined the cause was tried to a jury and a verdict rendered for the defendants (appellees here). The appellants seek a new trial because of the rulings of the Tria Court in regard to the voir dire examination of the jury panel, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. DeLong v. GreenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
  2. Charles v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
  3. Missouri Pacific Transportation Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
  4. Baldwin, Trustees Mo. Pac. R.R. v. HunnicuttSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
  5. Malone v. RileySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1959

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Finch v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  2. Tatum v. ResterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
  3. TATUM V. RESTERSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
  4. Tatum v. ResterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API