Legal Opinion
Mjolsness v. Riley
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 6, 1994No. C1-94-356PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SHORT, Judge.
On appeal from a grant of summary judgment, Bradley A. Mjolsness argues that Lance W. Riley is not immune from suit under Minn.Stat. § 253B.23, subd. 4 (1992).
FACTS
Mjolsness and Riley were close Mends and Riley was Mjolsness’s personal attorney for over nine years. Their relationship changed when Riley suggested that Mjolsness get substance abuse treatment.
Mjolsness had a long history of depression. He received outpatient psychiatric treatment and took a prescription anti-depressant drug. While taking anti-depressant medication, .Mjolsness continued to drink alcohol and to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Elwood v. County of RiceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Rico v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Rahman v. Mayo ClinicCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
- Charles Anderson v. Yellow Medicine Cty.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002