Ruth v. Jester
Supreme Court of Virginia
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the CourtWhittle, J.
The holographic will of Thomas M. Hughes was probated before the clerk of the trial court on November 10, 1954, and Royston Jester, Jr. qualified as administrator c.t.a. Thereafter Virginia Hughes Ruth appealed the probate proceedings and upon a hearing the chancellor entered an order admitting the will to probate. Whereupon the administrator c.t.a. brought this suit to construe the will, malting all parties in interest defendants thereto. Upon submission of the case, the chancellor entered the decree complained of holding the will “void and of no effect for vagueness and uncertainty in any…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Pitman v. RutledgeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1956
- Wilkes' Administrator v. WilkesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1914
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jessup v. JessupSupreme Court of Virginia · 1980
- Sheltering Arms Hospital v. First & Merchants National BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1957
- Gill v. GillCuyahoga County Probate Court · 1965
- Etgen v. CorboySupreme Court of Virginia · 1985
- In re the Estate of RicksNew York Surrogate's Court · 1965