Legal Opinion

Pitman v. Rutledge

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided November 26, 1956No. Record 4588PublishedCited by 17 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtBuchanan, J.

The executors of the will of Miss Charlotte B. Coles brought this suit for the purpose of having the will and a codicil thereto construed. Lorraine F. Pitman and George M. Coles, executors, were also legatees in their own right and being disappointed by the court’s construction, which deprived them of their legacy, they prosecute this appeal. The appellees are the children of Mrs. Charles J. Graham, to whom the testatrix gave by the codicil, so the court held, the tangible personal property which she had previously given to the appellants by the will.

The will of Miss Coles was a typewritten…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Allison v. Allison's ExecutorsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1903
  2. Coffman's Adm'r v. CoffmanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1921
  3. McKinsey v. CullingsworthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1940
  4. Smith v. Trustees of the Baptist OrphanageSupreme Court of Virginia · 1953
  5. Domestic & Foreign Missionary Society v. Crippled Children's HospitalSupreme Court of Virginia · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Weiss v. SotoWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Weiss v. SotoWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Estate of Fine v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1988
  4. Virginia National Bank, and Trustee U/w of Lee B. Zittrain, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1971
  5. Newton v. NewtonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1958

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API