Legal Opinion · Dissent

Alabama v. Shelton

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 20, 2002No. 00-1214Published

1Dissent

Justice Scalia, with whom The Chief Justice, Justice Kennedy, and Justice Thomas join,

dissenting.

In Argersinger v. Hamlin, 407 U. S. 25, 37 (1972), we held that “absent a knowing and intelligent waiver, no person may be imprisoned for any offense ... unless he was represented by counsel at his trial.” (Emphasis added.) Although, we said, the “run of misdemeanors will not be affected” by this rule, “in those that end up in the actual deprivation of a person’s liberty, the accused will receive the benefit” of appointed counsel. Id., at 40 (emphasis added). We affirmed this rule in Scott v.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Scott v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. M. L. B. v. S. L. J.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API