Legal Opinion

Claim for benefits of Howard v. Joplin Stone Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 24, 2014No. SD 33251PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAM W. FRANCIS, JR., C.J./P.J.

This appeal arises out of a claim for unemployment benefits by claimant Paul Howard (“Claimant”), which was contested *263by his employer, Joplin Stone Company (“Joplin Stone”). After an initial determination that Claimant was not disqualified from receiving benefits for misconduct, Joplin Stone appealed the deputy’s determination utilizing the form from the Missouri Division of Employment Security (“Division”), supplemented by an appeal letter submitted by Michelle Brown (“Brown”), who was identified as the “Human Resource Manager” for Joplin Stone.

Subsequently,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Farmer v. KinderSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
  2. Manzara v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2011
  3. Bydalek v. BrinesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Borges v. Missouri Public Entity Risk Management FundMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Haggard v. Division of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of Missouri · 2007

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Michele Pinkowski v. Washington University, and Division of Employment SecurityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API