Legal Opinion

(PS) Lull v. County of Sacramento

District Court, E.D. California

Decided September 2, 2021No. 2:17-cv-01211Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHRISTOPHER LULL, Case No. 2:17-cv-01211-TLN-JDP (PS) 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS THAT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR 13 v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT BE DENIED AND DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY 14 CORY STEWART, JUDGMENT BE GRANTED 15 Defendants. ECF Nos. 65, 68 16 OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN DAYS 17 18 19 Reasonableness drives the Fourth Amendment. What is reasonable in one situation will 20 be unreasonable in another, and so the extent of the Fourth Amendment’s protection varies. 21 Further…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API