Legal Opinion
State v. Hart
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided June 18, 1917PublishedCited by 5 opinions
On error to fclie Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 88 N. J. L. 48.
1Opinion of the Court
Tire opinion of the court was delivered by
Kalisch, J.
The defendant in error was indicted for seduction. On bis trial, in the Quarter Sessions Court of Mercer county, the trial judge directed the jury to acquit him. The state sued out a writ of error in the Supreme Court to the Court of Quarter Sessions, which writ was dismissed by the Supreme Court upon the ground that in order for the state to secure a review of a trial error, it must be able to have a bill of exceptions and a writ of error based thereon to remove the case to that court, and since the statute makes no such provision, and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. VermilyeaNew York Supreme Court · 1827
- The People v. . CorningNew York Court of Appeals · 1848
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. FelchSupreme Court of Vermont · 1918
- Dept. of Cons. and Eco. Dev. v. ScipioNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
- State v. DwyerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1943
- State v. KleinwaksSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
- State v. O'tooleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934