Legal Opinion

Matter of Ridout v. . Rogers Hagerty, Incorporated

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 26, 1918PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered July 11, 1918, which affirmed an award of the state industrial commission made under the Workmen’s Compensation Law. The claimant. was in the employ of Rogers &■ Hagerty, and while engaged in laying brick work in a sewer in the city of New York was injured by an explosion in the sewer.

Read the full summary

Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered July 11, 1918, which affirmed an award of the state industrial commission made under the Workmen’s Compensation Law. The claimant. was in the employ of Rogers &■ Hagerty, and while engaged in laying brick work in a sewer in the city of New York was injured by an explosion in the sewer. He filed an election to sue a third party, reserving, however, to himself and his dependents all rights and remedies under the Compensation Act. He did sue the third party but, it…

1Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Chase, Collin, Cuddeback, Hogan, McLaughlin and Crane, JJ.

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Claim of Kaplan v. Kaplan Knitting Mills, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Spencer-Kellogg & Sons, Inc. v. WillardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
  3. Polino v. United States Radiator Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API