Legal Opinion

Whitehead v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 13, 1953No. 49572PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

The facts sufficiently appear from the opinion of the court.

2Opinion of the Court · WhitakerWhitaker, Judge

This case is before us on defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s petition because it says the petition (1) fails to state a cause of action within the jurisdiction of this court, and (2) does not state a cause of action upon which relief can be granted.

The Secretary of the Navy renegotiated plaintiff’s contracts with persons who had contracts with the United States and found that he had realized excess profits of $29,947.84 between April 28, 19421 and December 31, 1942. Against *138this amount a Federal income tax credit was allowed,…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Lichter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. MacAuley v. Waterman Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Hickey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1950
  5. Ring Construction Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1952

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Moen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954
  2. United States v. Whitehouse & Pine, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1958
  3. Dresser Operations, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API