Legal Opinion

United States v. Whitehouse & Pine, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 11, 1958PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEVET, District Judge.

Plaintiff has moved for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A.

This action is brought pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C.A. § 1345 and Section 403(c) of the Renegotiation Act, as amended (50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 1191).

The complaint alleges that after notice to the defendant, proceedings were had and conducted by the representative of the Navy Price Adjustment Board (Services and Sales Renegotiation Section) pursuant to the Renegotiation Act, as amended, to determine the amount of the excessive profits realized by the defendant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. MacAuley v. Waterman Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Moen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954
  3. Whitehead v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
  4. United States v. Whitehouse & Pine, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1954

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tom Samuels, Trustee of Future Manufacturing Cooperative, Inc., a Corporation v. Kockos Bros., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  2. Melendres v. SkinnerDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024
  3. Melendres v. SkinnerDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API