Legal Opinion

State v. Remen

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 14, 1924No. 23,878PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, C.

The defendants were convicted of the crime of robbery and appeal from an order denying a new trial.

Only one question is presented. At the trial, after the state had rested and while a witness called in behalf of the defendants was being examined by Mr. Malmberg, their attorney, the court took a short recess. What occurred when the court reconvened is stated in the record as follows:

“The Court: Stand out here, Mr. Juror, the gentleman that I was speaking to. (One of the jurors rises.)
“The Court: You say that this man approached you just a while ago?
“One of the jury: A while ago and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. SalversonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  2. State v. FloydSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  3. Young v. OttoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nelson v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  2. State v. PliamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API