Legal Opinion

Cliffstar Corp. v. Riverbend Products, Inc.

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided November 15, 1990No. CIV-89-344CPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CURTIN, District Judge.

BACKGROUND

There are two disputes at issue in this case. Plaintiff Cliffstar Corporation (“Cliffstar”) has moved for summary judgment on its claimed loss from partial delivery of an order of 3.2 million pounds of tomato paste. Defendant Riverbend Products, Inc. (“Riverbend”) has cross-moved for summary judgment for payment on its delivery to Cliffstar of ten boxcars of lemon concentrate and also for payment on the tomato paste it actually delivered to Cliffstar.

FACTS

I. TOMATO PASTE CONTRACT

Riverbend processes and sells tomato paste and frozen citrus products. It has…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Perma Research and Development Company v. The Singer CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
  3. Studley v. Boylston National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Roth Steel Products, and Toledo Steel Tube Company, Cross-Appellants v. Sharon Steel Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
  5. Nissho-Iwai Co., Ltd. v. Occidental Crude Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Upsher-Smith Laboratories, Inc. v. Mylan Laboratories, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1996
  2. Hoosier Energy Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. John Hancock Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2008
  3. Lavery v. KearnsDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1992
  4. PC Com, Inc. v. Proteon, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
  5. Exelon Generation Co. v. General Atomics Technologies Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API