Legal Opinion

Rothsville Knitting Mills Assigned Estate

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 1, 1912No. Appeal, No. 178PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal, No. 178, Oct. T., 1911, by J. W. Baker, from order of C. P. Lancaster Co., Trust Book No. 21, page 440, dismissing exceptions to auditor’s report In re Assigned Estate of Rothsville Knitting Mills. Exceptions to report of J. W. Brown, Esq., auditor. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. Errors assigned were in dismissing exceptions to auditor’s report.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rice, P. J.,

This is an appeal by J. W. Baker from the decree dismissing the exceptions filed by him to the report of the auditor appointed to make distribution of the balance shown by the final account of the assignees for the benefit of creditors of the Rothsville Knitting Mills. Thé claim of the appellant was based on a note in his'favor for $2,115 payable one day after date, with confession of judgment and usual waivers, signed “Rothsville Knitting Mills, Inc. (Seal), C. W. Grosh, Treas. (Seal).” The question in the case was, whether the original note, of which this was the last…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hindman's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1877
  2. Estate of DuttonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
  3. Monongahela National Bank v. Harmony Land Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dydo Unemployment Compensation Case v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API