Legal Opinion

Monongahela National Bank v. Harmony Land Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 3, 1910No. Appeal, No. 162PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal, No. 162, Oct. T., 1909, by plaintiff, from order of C. P. No. 4, Allegheny Co., Fourth Term, 1907, No. 971, refusing to take off nonsuit in case of Monongahela National Bank of Brownsville v. Harmony Land Company. Assumpsit on a promissory note.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 162, Oct. T., 1909, by plaintiff, from order of C. P. No. 4, Allegheny Co., Fourth Term, 1907, No. 971, refusing to take off nonsuit in case of Monongahela National Bank of Brownsville v. Harmony Land Company. Assumpsit on a promissory note. Swearingen, J., filed the following opinion on motion to take off nonsuit. ' - This abtion was brought by the Monongahela National Bank of Brownsville against the Harmony'Land Company to recover the balance of a promissory note) of which the following together with the indorsements thereon is a copy: “$5,000.00 Pittsburgh, Pa., Aug. 11, 1905.…

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of the learned judge of the common pleas.

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Newton v. Houston Hot Well Improvement Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  2. Commonwealth Trust Co. v. First-Second National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  3. Rothsville Knitting Mills Assigned EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API