Legal Opinion

White v. Miley

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1926No. 19666. Department OnePublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

An appeal and cross-appeal are involved herein, and the parties will be designated as plaintiff and defendants respectively.

The suit was brought to recover on three separate causes of action. The first cause of action was to recover for certain work under an alleged oral agreement in clearing and grubbing a right-of-way for a certain public highway in Clallam county. Plaintiff alleged as to that cause of action that on about July 7, 1922, he was clearing and grubbing such right-of-way under a written contract with defendants; that on about that date the parties by mutual agreement rescinded…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Baird v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Buddress v. SchaferWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Achey v. CreechWashington Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Whitaker v. HawleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
  5. Konick v. ChampneysWashington Supreme Court · 1919

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Maxwell v. Provident Mutual Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Maxwell v. Provident Mutual Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API