Legal Opinion

People v. Eaton

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 4, 1959No. Crim. 6530PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.

Defendant was charged by information with forcible rape and burglary. Upon trial by the court sitting without a jury he was adjudged guilty of both offenses, the burglary being fixed in the first degree due to the accompanying assault. Three prior felony convictions were admitted and he was sentenced to the state’s prison. He appeals from the judgment of conviction and the order denying a motion for new trial.

Pursuant to recognized rules, the following narration of the evidence is in the aspect most favorable to the respondent. At or about 5 o’clock on the morning of June 16, 1958, the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. HustonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. People v. HorowitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  3. Gantner v. GantnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. People v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Connell v. ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. LindsayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. People v. GuyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  3. People v. SpinksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  4. People v. McFarlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  5. People v. Ingram CA2/6California Court of Appeal · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API