Legal Opinion

Arnold Exhibit & Design, Inc. v. ABF Freight System, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 31, 1997Published

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Plaintiff commenced this action to recover damages for goods allegedly lost by defendant, a connecting carrier, in shipment from California to plaintiff’s office in New York. The bill of lading required plaintiff to file a timely notice of claim with either defendant or the issuing carrier as a condition precedént to recovery. That standard requirement is authorized by Federal law (49 USC § 11706 [e]) and is generally held to be mandatory (see,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc. v. Long Island Rail RoadNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Georgia, Florida & Alabama Railway Co. v. Blish Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. Ayotte v. GervasioNew York Court of Appeals · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API