Legal Opinion

Ayotte v. Gervasio

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 15, 1993PublishedCited by 177 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, and the certified question answered in the negative.

"[T]he proponent of a summary judgment motion must make a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, tendering sufficient evidence to demonstrate the absence of any material issues of fact” (Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324). The "[failure to make such prima facie showing requires a denial of the motion, regardless of the sufficiency of the opposing papers” (id., at 324). Here, in support of their summary…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986

3Cited by177 opinions

  1. Grullon v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. Wein v. Amato Properties, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. Katona v. LowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  4. Cohen v. MastenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  5. Yong Wen Mo v. Gee Ming ChanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

172 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API