Prater v. Snead
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Saline District Cowrt. Snead sued John J. Prater, Catlett Prater and Joseph Peters, for professional services as an attorney-and-counselor-at-law, and recovered judgment, at the April Term 1872 of the district court, for $1,225. The defendants bring the case here. The facts are fully stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Valentine, J.:
statement of the case.
*449 i Amendment on triíji.
*448We perceive no error in this case. It is claimed by the plaintiffs in error (defendants below) that the court below erroneously allowed the defendant in error to amend the first count of his petition after all the evidence on the trial had been introduced, and just before the argument of the case had been commenced by counsel. The cause of action stated in this count was principally for services alleged to have been rendered by Snead for the defendants below, as an…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Kansas Pacific Rly. Co. v. SalmonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
- City of Atchison v. JansenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1879
- Bird & Mickle Map Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
- Baird v. TruittSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877