Legal Opinion

Cole v. Bailey

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 17, 1958No. [No. 31, September Term, 1958.]PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.

We are called upon to decide whether a testator intended his residuary estate to go to his nephews and nieces in equal shares or whether he intended, as the chancellor found, that one nephew, the only child of his sister, should take one-half, and the other seven, children of his brother, should take the other one-half in equal shares.

The will gives the rest and residue to a corporate trustee in trust to pay the income to the testator’s wife for life and directs that at her death the principal and accumulated income “shall be divided equally between my nephews and nieces, children of my…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Corr's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Slingluff v. JohnsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1898
  3. Patchell v. GroomCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1945
  4. Bradlee v. ConverseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  5. Lycett v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Johnson v. HallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  2. Weller v. SokolCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  3. Gallaudet University v. National Society of the Daughters of the American RevolutionCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  4. Purifoy v. Mercantile-Safe Deposit and Trust Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1974
  5. Sollers v. Mercantile-Safe Deposit & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1971

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API