Legal Opinion

Dudley v. Shaw

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1890PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from Dickinson District Court. Ejectment. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Green, C.:

The plaintiff below commenced a suit in ejectment to recover the south half of the northwest *684quarter of section 22, in township 14 south, of range 3 east, in Dickinson county. The defendant Charles M. Shaw filed an answer, first, denying the allegations of the petition; and, second, denying that plaintiff had any title to said land; and, for a third count, alleged:

“Said defendant, further answering, says that on or before the 18th day of July, 1885, one James McIntyre and Anna McIntyre were lawfully married to each other, and occupied the premises described in said…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pilcher v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Matney v. LinnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1898
  2. Eakin v. WycoffSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  3. Wallace v. Travelers' InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894
  4. Shay v. Bevis Rock Salt Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  5. Cox v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. (In Re Cox)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API