Legal Opinion
City of Racine v. Weyhe
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided September 14, 1942Published
1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.
The ordinance under which the defendant was prosecuted defines a transient photographer as follows:
“One who engages in the business or occupation of photography or the sale of photographs, enlargements or coupons therefor in the city of Racine temporarily and who does not become a permanent photographer of the city of Racine.”
Sec. 2 of the ordinance provides that no person shall engage in or follow the business or occupation of a transient photographer without first procuring a license therefor. In order to procure a license the applicant is required to deposit $10 for each day for which he…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- New State Ice Co. v. LiebmannSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Hack v. City of Mineral PointWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- City of Monroe v. EndelmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
- City of Janesville v. HeiserWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933