Legal Opinion

City of Racine v. Weyhe

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided September 14, 1942Published

1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.

The ordinance under which the defendant was prosecuted defines a transient photographer as follows:

“One who engages in the business or occupation of photography or the sale of photographs, enlargements or coupons therefor in the city of Racine temporarily and who does not become a permanent photographer of the city of Racine.”

Sec. 2 of the ordinance provides that no person shall engage in or follow the business or occupation of a transient photographer without first procuring a license therefor. In order to procure a license the applicant is required to deposit $10 for each day for which he…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. New State Ice Co. v. LiebmannSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Hack v. City of Mineral PointWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  3. City of Monroe v. EndelmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  4. City of Janesville v. HeiserWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API