Legal Opinion
City of Janesville v. Heiser
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided February 7, 1933PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNelsoN, J.
The complaint charges that the defendant unlawfully and illegally possessed intoxicating liquor fit for beverage purposes in violation of sec. 3 of ordinance 186 of the General Ordinances of the city of Janesville, which is as follows:
“After this ordinance becomes effective the possession of intoxicating liquor, as herein defined, by any person, other than in his private dwelling used exclusively as such, or except as authorized by the 'National Prohibition Act/ is hereby prohibited. The possession of intoxicating liquor by any person not legally permitted under the National Prohibition Act…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hack v. City of Mineral PointWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- City of Milwaukee v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
- Koch v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
- City of Oshkosh v. SchwartzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
- C. Beck Co. v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Madison Metropolitan Sewerage District v. Committee on Water PollutionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
- State Ex Rel. Keefe v. SchmiegeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
- City of Racine v. WeyheWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942