Legal Opinion

Star Fire Clay Co. v. Budno

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 13, 1920No. 3413PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern Division of the Northern District of Ohio; D. C. Westenhaver Judge. Action at law by Michael Budno, Sr., administrator of. the estate of Michael Budno, Jr., deceased, against the Star Eire Clay Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

DONAHUE, Circuit Judge.

This proceeding in error is brought to reverse the judgment of the United States District Court, Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, in an action in which Michael Bud-no, Sr., as administrator of the estate of Michael Budno, Jr., deceased, sought to recover damages for the benefit of next of kin of decedent. The petition filed in the District Court avers that the death of Michael Budno, Jr., was caused by and through the negligence of the defendant, the Star Fire Clay Company; that the decedent left surviving him his father and mother, Michael Budno, Sr., and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Narramore v. Cleveland, C., C. & St. L. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1899
  2. North Pennsylvania Railroad v. MahoneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1868
  3. Gwynne v. NeiswangerOhio Supreme Court · 1849

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. StapletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Daly v. Swift & Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Borovitz v. American Hard Rubber Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1923
  4. Newton v. Illinois Oil Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API