Gwynne v. Neiswanger
Ohio Supreme Court
This is a bill in chancery, reserved in Madison county. The object of the bill is to enjoin a judgment in ejectment, recovered by the defendant against the complainant, and to compel the defendant to convey or release to the complainant all his interest in the land recovered in the ejectment case.
Read the full summary
This is a bill in chancery, reserved in Madison county. The object of the bill is to enjoin a judgment in ejectment, recovered by the defendant against the complainant, and to compel the defendant to convey or release to the complainant all his interest in the land recovered in the ejectment case. The bill sets forth an entry by David Ross, as assignee, about June 22d, 1810, Number 6780, for six hundred and forty acres of land, lying in the Virginia Military District, and in Madison county, which was surveyed about April 26, 1816. That all the preliminaries having been complied with that are…
1Opinion of the CourtHitchcock, J.
It will he seen by the statement of the case. *402that the complainant claims an interest in the land in contro versy, under a deed from a purchaser for taxes. The land so sold was sold under the law of January 29th, 1827, and at the time of sale the title was in the United States. It is sit mated in the Yirginia Military District, and was entered with the surveyor of the district, on the 22d of June, 1810, in the name of David Ross assignee, on three military warrants and part of a fourth — No. of entry 6780, — quantity of land 640 acres. On the 26th April, 1815, the land included in the entry…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Wymore v. Mahaska CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1889
- N. & W. R. R. v. Groseclose's Adm'rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1891
- G., H. & H. R'y Co. v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1883
- Roberts v. First National BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1899
- Battishill v. HumphreysMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.