Legal Opinion
Westinghouse Mach. Co. v. Electric Storage Battery Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey
Decided December 15, 1908PublishedCited by 2 opinions
In Equity. On demurrer to bill.
1Opinion of the Court
CROSS, District Judge.
This matter comes before the court upon demurrer to the bill of complaint, which may be briefly summarized as follows: That on December 31, 1907, letters patent No. 875,213, for improvements in secondary or storage batteries, were granted to the defendant upon the alleged joint invention of Hugh Rodman and George M. Howard; that all interest and rights under said patent are now vested in the defendant; that the complainant is manufacturing batteries which the defendant claims infringe its patent; that the defendant has notified the complainant and its customers of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Flower v. MacGinnissCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1901
- Booker v. BookerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1856
- New York & Baltimore Coffee Polishing Co. v. New York Coffee Polishing Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York · 1881
- Zych v. American Car & Foundry Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1904
- Magone v. Colorado Smelting & Mining Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Montana · 1905
3Cited by2 opinions
- Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Westinghouse Mach. Co. v. Electric Storage Battery Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1909