Golish v. Feinstein
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtYork, J.
Two appeals have been prosecuted by the plaintiff in the above-entitled action, which appeals came to this court upon bills of exceptions.
The default of the defendant for failure to answer the second amended complaint was entered on the eleventh day of July, 1929; a judgment by default by clerk was entered in plaintiff’s favor on the same day, and execution was placed in the hands of the sheriff. Thereafter, on the ■fifteenth day of July, 1929, defendant served and filed his -notice of intention to move to vacate the said default judgment, and at the same time served his notice of intention…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hibbard v. ChipmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856
3Cited by3 opinions
- Estate of BuchmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Ryan v. WelteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Barry v. Contractors State License BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948