Legal Opinion

Golish v. Feinstein

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 19, 1932No. Docket Nos. 6937, 7091PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYork, J.

Two appeals have been prosecuted by the plaintiff in the above-entitled action, which appeals came to this court upon bills of exceptions.

The default of the defendant for failure to answer the second amended complaint was entered on the eleventh day of July, 1929; a judgment by default by clerk was entered in plaintiff’s favor on the same day, and execution was placed in the hands of the sheriff. Thereafter, on the ■fifteenth day of July, 1929, defendant served and filed his -notice of intention to move to vacate the said default judgment, and at the same time served his notice of intention…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hibbard v. ChipmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Estate of BuchmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  2. Ryan v. WelteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. Barry v. Contractors State License BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API