State v. Coates
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Bell, J., entered February 24, 1912, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in quo warranto, after a trial on the merits.
1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.
— The relator was removed, without cause being shown for such removal, from the position of “crosswalk foreman,” in the city of Spokane, by the commissioner of public works of that city, and the appellant Rose was appointed to perform the same duties, although under the title of sub-street foreman. The relator brought this proceeding in quo warranto seeking to be restored to the position, and to recover the salary during the time of his ouster. He suc*36ceeded in the court below, and this appeal is prosecuted from the judgment entered in his favor.
The case is here upon the findings of fact made…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State ex rel. Powell v. FassettWashington Supreme Court · 1912
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- State ex rel. Roe v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- State ex rel. Gilmur v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- State Ex Rel. Allen v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1929
- Petley v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.