Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In re Complaint of Judicial Misconduct

Judicial Council of The Ninth Circuit

Decided December 28, 2010No. 09-90239PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Complainant, a pro se litigant, filed a misconduct complaint against a magistrate judge. Instead of filing a statement of facts, complainant attached over a hundred pages of material including what appear to be documents from his underlying civil rights case, various motions purportedly made before the “executive branch, et al,” two copies of a letter from a financial specialist, seven photocopies of envelopes, a copy of three receipts, an automated email from PACER and two local court rules. Complainant also attached a filing in which the defendants accused him of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re Judicial MisconductUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
  2. In re Complaint of Judicial MisconductJudicial Council of The Ninth Circuit · 2008
  3. In Re Opinion of Judicial Conference Committee to Review Circuit Council Conduct and Disability OrdersCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  4. In Re Complaint of Judicial MisconductUnited States Judicial Conference Committee · 2009

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint of Judicial MisconductCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  2. In Re Complaint of Judicial MisconductCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  3. In Re Complaint of Judicial MisconductCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  4. In re Complaint of Judicial MisconductJudicial Council of The Ninth Circuit · 2011
  5. In Re Complaint of Judicial MisconductCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API