Legal Opinion
Doe v. Shalala
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided September 26, 1994No. Civ. PJM 94-1703PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MESSITTE, District Judge.
I
Plaintiffs in this suit seek to enjoin the activity of the National Institutes' of Health (NIH) Human Embryo Research Panel (Panel) on the grounds that the membership of the Panel is not “fairly balanced” within the meaning of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), 5 U.S.C., App. 2, § 5(b)(2) and on the further grounds that Section 101 of the NIH Revitalization Act of 1993 (Revitalization Act), 42 U.S.C. § 289a-l, violates the U.S. Constitution. More immediately, their objective is to prevent the Panel from holding any meetings or making any…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Sherley v. SebeliusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Physicians For Social Responsibility v. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Center for Law & Education v. United States Department of EducationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Doe v. ObamaDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2009
- International Foundation for Genetic Research (Michael Fund) v. ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.