Waites v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.
Appellant was convicted of pursuing the business of selling intoxicating liquors, his punishment being assessed at two years confinement in the penitentiary.
The Assistant Attorney General seeks to dismiss the appeal because of the insufficiency or rather the illegality of the appeal recognizance. The point of attack is, the recognizance requires appellant to appear “instanter” before the trial court to await the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals, it being based upon the idea that the word “instanter” is more onerous than the statute authorizes. We can not…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Maples v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
- Floyd v. RiceTexas Supreme Court · 1866
- Leon & H. Blum v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1894
- Rice v. WardTexas Supreme Court · 1900
- Hall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.