Legal Opinion

Freedman v. Looney, Warden

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided January 26, 1954No. 4767_1PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from an order dismissing a petition for habeas corpus without a hearing. The petition, apparently prepared without the assistance of counsel, is voluminous and most of the matters complained of are not material in a habeas corpus proceeding. The allegations establish that while the petitioner was serving a sentence in the United States Penitentiary at Leavenworth, Kansas he was released under the provisions of the Conditional Release Statutes; that a short time thereafter he was arrested in Toledo, Ohio, and charged with the offense of operating a refund racket, upon trial…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Anderson v. CorallSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Zerbst v. KidwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Christianson v. ZerbstCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1937
  4. Nave v. Bell, U.S. MarshalCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1950
  5. Bowers v. DishongCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StuckerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  2. Ray Earnest v. R. I. Moseley, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Leavenworth, KansasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
  3. James B. Wright v. Dr. R. O. Settle, Warden, United States Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
  4. Lopez v. MadiganDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1959
  5. Marshall Clark v. Lewis B. Stevens, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1961

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API