Legal Opinion · Dissent

Olinger Construction Co. v. Mosbey

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 10, 1981No. 2-581A148Published

1DissentSullivan, Judge

I respectfully dissent. An employee or his dependents are not eligible for Workmen’s Compensation benefits unless his injury or death arose “out of and in the course of the employment.” I.C. 22-3 — 2-2 (Burns Code Ed. Supp.1980).

I have no quarrel with the conclusion of the majority that Mosbey’s death occurred while he was “in the course of” his employment. I do not agree, however, that it “arose out of” that employment. The causal connection necessary to the latter statutory requisite is that the death must arise “out of a risk which a reasonable person might comprehend as incidental to the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Claim of Katz v. A. Kadans & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1922
  2. Lasear, Inc. v. AndersonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1934
  3. In re HarradenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  4. Burroughs Adding Machine Co. v. DehnIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942
  5. C. A. Dunham Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1959

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API