Legal Opinion

In re Harraden

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 20, 1917No. 10,087PublishedCited by 40 opinions

From the Industrial Board of Indiana. Certified question of law. Proceedings under the Workmen’s Compensation Act in the matter of one Charles Harraden. Certified question of law by the Industrial Board.

1Opinion of the CourtFelt, J.

— The Industrial Board of this state has submitted a statement of facts on which it has certified a question of law in substance as follows:

Statement of Facts.

The Columbia Insurance Company is a duly organized corporation under the laws of the State of Indiana and prior to March 19, 1917, had been duly authorized to transact the business of fire insurance in the States of Ohio and Michigan; that on and prior to March 20, 1917, Charles H. Harraden was employed by said insurance company at the monthly *299salary of $175, and was under the control of the home office of said company which was located…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. McNicol's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  2. Bryant v. FissellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1913
  3. Sponatski's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
  4. Larke v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
  5. Pigeon's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Empire Health & Accident Insurance v. PurcellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1921
  2. Burroughs Adding Machine Co. v. DehnIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942
  3. Olinger Construction Co. v. MosbeyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Walker v. Speeder MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1932
  5. Central Surety & Insurance v. Mrs. Cora Trawick CourtTennessee Supreme Court · 1931

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API