Mangold v. Nissan North America, Inc.
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lytton
Plaintiffs, Christopher and Erynn Mangold, brought suit against Nissan North America (Nissan) pursuant to the Magnuson-Moss Warranty — Federal Trade Commission Improvement Act (15 U.S.C. § 2301 et seq. (2000)) (Act). The complaint alleged that Nissan failed to uphold provisions of its warranties on a vehicle purchased by a financial services company and leased to plaintiffs. Nissan filed a motion to dismiss, contending that leases do not fall under the protection of the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act. The circuit court of Will County denied Nissan’s motion. The court then granted Nissan’s…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Nottage v. JekaIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
- Collins Co. v. Carboline Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1988
- DiCintio v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Voelker v. Porsche Cars North America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Dekelaita v. Nissan Motor Corp. in USAAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Mesa v. BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- Peterson v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
- Cerasani v. American Honda Motor Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- Christine Seney v. Rent-a-Center, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- Parrot v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.