Legal Opinion

Timmons v. City of Montgomery

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided May 20, 1994No. CR-91-1460PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sarah Leslie Timmons was convicted of violating the Vehicle Tinted Window Statute, § 32-5-215(d), Code of Alabama 1975. The appellant was fined $56.00 plus court costs of $34.00.

I

The appellant contends that § 32-5-215(d), Code of Alabama 1975, the Vehicle Window Tinting Statute, is unconstitutionally vague, because, she argues, the statute does not specify the degree of tinting allowed or prohibited. The statute provides as follows:

"(d) No person shall operate a motor vehicle which has a windshield, sidewing or rear window which has tinting to the extent or manufactured in such a way that…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Vaughn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2003
  2. K.E.W. v. T.W.E.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2007
  3. Scott v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2005
  4. City of Montgomery v. NormanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1999
  5. Ross Neely Systems, Inc. v. Occidental Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API