Legal Opinion
Equus Associates Ltd. v. Town of Southampton
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided August 27, 1997No. CV 94-4274(ADS)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER
SPATT, District Judge.
This section 1983 action arises from the claims of the plaintiff, Equus Associates Ltd. (“Equus” or the “plaintiff’), that the defendants, the Town of Southampton (the “Town”), its Town Board, the current Town Board members, Fred Thiele, Martha Rogers, Douglas Penny and Patrick Heaney, Jr., the past Town Board members who sat on the Board during the relevant time period, George Starvropoulos, Marietta Seaman, James Needham, the late Patrick Heaney, Sr. and Patricia Neumann, and the Town Attorney, Michael Walsh (collectively the…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hafer v. MeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Carol A. Gallo v. Prudential Residential Services, Limited Partnership, Doing Business as Prudential Relocation ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Colon v. CoughlinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hampton Bays Connections, Inc. v. DuffyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2001
- Equus Associates, Ltd v. Town of SouthamptonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1999