Legal Opinion
Equus Associates, Ltd v. Town of Southampton
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided February 27, 1999No. CV 94-4274 (ADS)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER
SPATT, District Judge.
In this Section 1983 action, the plaintiff Equus Associates Ltd. (“Equus” or the “plaintiff’) alleges that the defendants, the Town of Southampton (the “Town”), its Town Board, the current Town Board members, the past Town Board members who sat on the Board during the relevant time period, and the former Town Attorney, Michael Walsh (collectively the “defendants”), engaged in an unbridled abuse of power when they unlawfully saddled its application for a building permit to erect six barns on its property for the purpose of breeding, raising…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Collins v. City of Harker HeightsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Quinn v. Nassau County Police DepartmentDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1999
- Economic Opportunity Commission of Nassau County, Inc. v. County of Nassau, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1999
- T.S. Haulers, Inc. v. Town of RiverheadDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2002
- Hampton Bays Connections, Inc. v. DuffyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2001
- Economic Opportunity Commission of Nassau County, Inc. v. County of NassauDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.