Faulk v. Knoxville HMA Holdings, LLC
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION JEREMY FAULK, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) No. 3:21-cv-00755 v. ) ) JUDGE RICHARDSON KNOXVILLE HMA HOLDING, LLC et ) al., ) ) Defendants. ) Memorandum Opinion and Order Pending before the Court1 are the parties’ motions for summary judgment (Doc. Nos. 80, 87). Jeremy Faulk (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se,2 brought suit3 under subsections (b) and (c) of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 (TCPA), 47 U.S.C. § 227, and state law to challenge telephone calls that he received that were made on behalf of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Cleveland v. Policy Management Systems Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Robert Dale Murr v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Pittman v. Experian Info. Solutions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.