State v. Austell
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Barnes, Chief Judge.
The State appeals (see OCGA§ 5-7-1 (4); State v. Mack, 207 Ga. App. 287 (1) (427 SE2d 615) (1993)) the trial court’s grant of Vinson Larry Austell’s motion in limine to suppress the results of a chemical test of Austell’s blood because of the undue delay between Austell’s arrest, after a traffic stop, and the reading of his implied consent warnings. Finding no error, we affirm the trial court.
1. When this court
reviews a trial court’s decision on a motion to suppress, our responsibility is to ensure that there was a substantial basis for the decision. Morgan v. State, 195…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Vansant v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
- Tate v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
- Morgan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
- Perano v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
- Hough v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Thrasher v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
- Harrelson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- The State v. Domenge-DelhoyoCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
- State v. AustellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- State v. Monique Domenge-DelhoyoCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.