Legal Opinion

State v. Austell

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 23, 2007No. A06A2171PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Barnes, Chief Judge.

The State appeals (see OCGA§ 5-7-1 (4); State v. Mack, 207 Ga. App. 287 (1) (427 SE2d 615) (1993)) the trial court’s grant of Vinson Larry Austell’s motion in limine to suppress the results of a chemical test of Austell’s blood because of the undue delay between Austell’s arrest, after a traffic stop, and the reading of his implied consent warnings. Finding no error, we affirm the trial court.

1. When this court

reviews a trial court’s decision on a motion to suppress, our responsibility is to ensure that there was a substantial basis for the decision. Morgan v. State, 195…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Vansant v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  2. Tate v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  3. Morgan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  4. Perano v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  5. Hough v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Thrasher v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  2. Harrelson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  3. The State v. Domenge-DelhoyoCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
  4. State v. AustellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  5. State v. Monique Domenge-DelhoyoCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API