Legal Opinion

Ruchman v. Wolff

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 1, 1992No. Action No. 1; Action No. 2Published

1Opinion of the Court

Orders, Supreme Court, New York County (Herman Cahn, J.), entered December 6, 1991, December 6, 1991, on or about January 6, 1992 and on or about March 25, 1992 vacating plaintiff’s note of issue, sealing the record, declaring Mary E. Lambert incompetent and appointing a committee, granting defendants summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and denying a cross motion by plaintiff to vacate a prior decision, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

We agree with the IAS Court that in Action No. 2, petitioner demonstrated incompetency by clear and convincing evidence (see, Matter of Grinker…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matter of Grinker (Rose)New York Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Grasso v. FiumaraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. Intercontinental Credit Corp. v. RothAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API