Legal Opinion

Otis v. Weiss

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 4, 1899No. 2,777PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From the Newton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenley, J.

— The assignment of errors in this cause, omitting the caption and conclusion, is as follows: (1) The damages assessed by the jury are excessive. (2) The assessment of the amount of recovery is erroneous, being too large. (3) The verdict of the jury is not sustained by sufficient evidence. (4) The verdict of the jury is contrary to law. (5) The court erred in giving instructions numbered five, six, seven, eight, nine, eleven, twelve, and thirteen. (6) Overruling appellants’ motion for a new trial.

The first five specifications present no question for review to this court. They only embody…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fort Wayne, Cincinnati & Louisville Railway Co. v. BeyerleIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Fitzmaurice v. PuterbaughIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. Loeb v. McAlisterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
  4. Steeg v. WallsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Citizens' Street Railway Co. v. DammIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900
  2. Roberts v. WolfeIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Whinrey v. StarrIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
  4. Newman v. NewmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API