Legal Opinion

In the Interest of R.M.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 21, 2002PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SAYLOR, Justice.

This ease concerns the constitutional requirement of notice in connection with an adjudication of dependency under the Juvenile Act, as well as the necessity for adherence to statutory directives governing an agency’s taking of custody under the Child Protective Services Law.

On February 3, 2000, Monroe County Children and Youth Services (“MCCYS”) received a referral from a school official to the effect that R.M., then ten years old, had reported that his adoptive parents physically abused him. MCCYS dispatched caseworkers to investigate, and R.M. was taken into…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Lehr v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Cole v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Larry S. Lucas, (97-5907)/petitioner-Appellant (97-6047) v. Michael J. O'dea, Warden, (97-5907)/respondent-Appellee (97-6047)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re Bridgeport Fire LitigationSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Commonwealth v. C.L.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  3. In the Interest of J.F.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. Kelly v. MuellerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Com. v. Martin, M. Jr.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API